From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MITHAQ AL HUMRANI #312961 v. KLEEMAN

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 17, 2008
Case No. 2:05-cv-203 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 17, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-cv-203.

June 17, 2008


OPINION


This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 27, 2008, this court entered a judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims. Thereafter, defendant filed a motion to tax costs against plaintiff in the amount of $138.50. On April 8, 2008, this court issued an order requiring plaintiff to file a response to defendant's motion. Plaintiff filed a response to defendant's motion on April 21, 2008.

The court finds that defendant's costs, including those sought under 28 U.S.C. § 1923(a), are authorized by statute and reasonable in nature and amount. See Meador-Bey v. Jones, No. 92-2379, 1993 WL 76228, at *1 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 509 U.S. 913 (1993); Berryman v. Epp, 884 F. Supp. 242, 244-45 (E.D. Mich. 1995). Costs in the amount of $138.50 are therefore approved.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134 (1996), removes the court's discretion to order relief from taxed costs on the basis of a prisoner's indigence. Under the Act, costs should generally be awarded regardless of whether the inmate is indigent. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(f)(2)(A); Singleton v. Smith, 241 F.3d 534, 539-40 (6th Cir. 2001). Defendant is entitled to an award of costs totaling $138.50.

A prisoner litigant against whom costs are taxed is now required to make an initial payment of costs equal to twenty percent of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account, or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account over a six month period. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (f)(2)(B). After an initial payment, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the Michigan Attorney General's Office each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the costs are paid in full.

Plaintiff filed a certificate establishing plaintiff's prison account activity. Plaintiff received an average monthly deposit of $7.32 to his account during the six months reported and has a current account balance of $0.00. Therefore, it appears that plaintiff is financially incapable of making an initial payment. Therefore, the Department of Corrections shall remit monthly payments from plaintiff's account as indicated above until the costs are paid in full.


Summaries of

MITHAQ AL HUMRANI #312961 v. KLEEMAN

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division
Jun 17, 2008
Case No. 2:05-cv-203 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 17, 2008)
Case details for

MITHAQ AL HUMRANI #312961 v. KLEEMAN

Case Details

Full title:MITHAQ AL HUMRANI #312961, Plaintiff, v. RUDOLPH KLEEMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Northern Division

Date published: Jun 17, 2008

Citations

Case No. 2:05-cv-203 (W.D. Mich. Jun. 17, 2008)