From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Sep 18, 2023
Civil Action 5:22-CV-50-RWS-JBB (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:22-CV-50-RWS-JBB

09-18-2023

TEVIN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI TEXARKANA, Defendant.


ORDER

ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Petitioner Tevin Mitchell's writ of habeas corpus. Docket No. 1. Petitioner, a federal prisoner confined at FCI Texarkana, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Boone Baxter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending that the writ of habeas corpus be denied as time-barred. Docket No. 15. Petitioner received the Magistrate Judge's Report on August 14, 2023. Docket No. 16. No objections have been filed.

Because no objections have been received, Petitioner is barred from de novo review by the District Judge of the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the District Court. See Duarte v. City of Lewisville, Texas, 858 F.3d 348, 352 (5th Cir. 2017); Arriaga v. Laxminarayan, Case No. 4:21-CV-00203-RAS, 2021 WL 3287683, at *1 (E.D. Tex. July 31, 2021).

The Court has reviewed the pleadings in this case and the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has determined the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (where no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is “clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law.”). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 16) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the Petitioner's writ of habeas corpus (Docket No. 1) is DENIED AS TIME-BARRED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Sep 18, 2023
Civil Action 5:22-CV-50-RWS-JBB (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Warden, FCI Texarkana

Case Details

Full title:TEVIN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI TEXARKANA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 5:22-CV-50-RWS-JBB (E.D. Tex. Sep. 18, 2023)