From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1843
37 N.C. 621 (N.C. 1843)

Opinion

(June Term, 1843.)

A commissioner to whom a matter has been referred by the court should state in his report all the evidence upon which the report is founded; otherwise, the report will be set aside.

THIS case had been referred by order of the court to a commissioner to make certain inquiries, and the report was now made. The defendant excepted because the commissioner had not set forth the evidence adduced before him.

No counsel for plaintiffs.

Alexander for defendants.


The defendants have excepted to the report of the commissioner made in this cause, because he hath not reported therewith the testimony upon which it is made. (622) This exception must be allowed. The party against whom any matter referred to a commissioner hath been found is entitled to appeal from his judgment to the court; and it is essential, therefore, that the testimony heard by the commissioner upon that inquiry should be all put in writing and accompany the report.

PER CURIAM. Report set aside.

Cited: Cain v. Nicholson, 77 N.C. 412.

(623)


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1843
37 N.C. 621 (N.C. 1843)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MITCHELL AND OTHERS v. WILLIAM WALKER AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1843

Citations

37 N.C. 621 (N.C. 1843)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Abrams

2nd Exception. A commissioner to whom a matter has been referred by the Court, should state in his report all…

Cain v. Nicholson

It has been frequently decided that the evidence in writing should accompany the report, so that the…