From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1137 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1137 GEB GGH P.

October 17, 2008


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed June 24, 2008, plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file a complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Unknown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1137 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. UNKNOWN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1137 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2008)