From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-8013-LSC-JHE (N.D. Ala. Dec. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-8013-LSC-JHE

12-10-2013

BOBBY EUGENE MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on November 1, 2013 (Doc. # 9), recommending that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, be DENIED. The parties were allowed an opportunity to file objections. Despite the fact that the magistrate judge granted (Doc. # 11) the petitioner's motion for an extension of time to object (Doc. # 10), no objections have been received from either party.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's findings are due to be and are hereby are ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be DENIED. A Final Judgment will be entered.

As to the foregoing it is SO ORDERED this the 10th day of December, 2013.

___________________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cv-8013-LSC-JHE (N.D. Ala. Dec. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Mitchell v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY EUGENE MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-8013-LSC-JHE (N.D. Ala. Dec. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dagubatti v. United States

Accordingly, his ineffective assistance claims against Mr. Alper also fail for this reason. See, e.g.,…