From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Apr 28, 2014
Civil No. 7:11-CV-029-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. 7:11-CV-029-O-KA

04-28-2014

LACARLTON DEWAYNE MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for denial set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

__________

Reed Q'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Apr 28, 2014
Civil No. 7:11-CV-029-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:LACARLTON DEWAYNE MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Director…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Apr 28, 2014

Citations

Civil No. 7:11-CV-029-O-KA (N.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2014)