From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 28, 1995
654 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-00121.

April 28, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald E. Pellecchia, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm Gregory Mitchell's conviction for robbery, but we remand the case because the written sentences do not comport with the trial court's oral pronouncement. The probationary terms in case numbers 93-376F, 93-378F, and 93-379F must run concurrently to reflect the trial court's pronouncement that Mitchell serve a total of ten years' probation. We also note that the trial court must structure the sentences so that Mitchell is not ordered to serve a prison sentence and a probationary term simultaneously. See Cox v. State, 468 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 28, 1995
654 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY CARNELL MITCHELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

654 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Oliver v. State

SAWAYA and WALLIS, JJ., concur.Cox v. State, 468 So.2d 437, 438 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) ; see also Benjamin, 667…