From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 20, 2022
No. 83286-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 20, 2022)

Opinion

83286-COA

01-20-2022

ROBERT LEE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Robert Lee Mitchell appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to modify sentence. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Kathleen M. Drakulich, Judge.

Mitchell argues the district court erred by denying his May 14, 2021. motion without first conducting an evidentiary hearing. In his motion, Mitchell requested a new sentencing hearing in this matter and in a separate, unrelated criminal case. Mitchell asserted that the sentences in both cases should have been imposed concurrently and contended that he should have been sentenced to a shorter term in the separate, unrelated case.

Mitchell's claims fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of any of the claims raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. See Hargrove v. State, 100 Nev. 498, 502-03, 686 P.2d 222, 225 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Gibbons, C.J., Tao, J., Bulla, J.

Hon. Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 20, 2022
No. 83286-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LEE MITCHELL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Jan 20, 2022

Citations

No. 83286-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 20, 2022)