Mitchell v. State

Full title: AMARTI MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

263 So. 3d 252 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-371

01-25-2019

Amarti MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kathryn Rollison Radtke, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

CORRECTED

PER CURIAM.

Amarti Mitchell appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after the trial court found he violated condition five of his order of probation for committing a new law violation. We affirm but remand solely for entry of a proper order revoking probation. See Dolinger v. State, 779 So.2d 419, 421 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (determining trial court erred by failing to enter a written revocation order and remanding for entry of said order); see also Green v. State, 23 So.3d 820, 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (remanding for entry of a written order revoking probation where record clearly showed the trial court had revoked appellant's probation).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of revocation order.

ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., and JACOBUS, B.W., Senior Judge, concur.