From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 4, 1989
549 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-0237.

October 4, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Edward Fine, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane E. Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant was convicted of the crimes of sexual battery, robbery and petit theft. The offenses were committed while appellant was on community control for the unrelated crimes of two counts of theft. A petition alleging violation of community control for these unrelated crimes was not before the court for sentencing. Appellant argues it was error for the trial court to increase his guidelines sentencing range by one cell due to his being on community control for unrelated crimes at the time of the instant offenses, while at the same time scoring legal constraint on the scoresheet. We agree.

When a defendant is sentenced only for a crime committed while he was already on probation, points should be scored for legal constraint. However, the one-cell increase pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14) for violation of probation is inapplicable because there has been no revocation of probation. Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121, 122 (Fla. 1988). We affirm the conviction but reverse and remand for resentencing within the guidelines and consistent with this opinion.

DOWNEY, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 4, 1989
549 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS MITCHELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 4, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. State

Petitioner's appellate counsel did not raise this issue at any time and the appeal was determined adversely…