From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 26, 1991
581 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-3096.

June 26, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, R. Hudson Olliff, J.

Rodney B. Mitchell, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Mitchell appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.

Mitchell's 3.850 motion alleges that (1) the circuit court did not make the necessary findings to classify Mitchell as a habitual violent felony offender, and (2) the habitual violent felony offender statute is unconstitutional.

The circuit court correctly found that section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1989), is constitutional. Virgil v. State, 577 So.2d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Mitchell's factual allegation that the circuit court did not make the necessary findings is facially insufficient. A 3.850 motion requires allegations which are more than mere conclusions. Flint v. State, 561 So.2d 1343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to Mitchell's right to file a properly drafted motion. Long v. State, 555 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 26, 1991
581 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY B. MITCHELL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 26, 1991

Citations

581 So. 2d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Wiley v. State

Therefore, it was properly treated as a motion filed pursuant to rule 3.850 by the trial court. As presently…

Davis v. State

Appellant's argument is facially insufficient to state a claim for postconviction relief because it is merely…