From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 1, 2016
Appellate case number: 01-16-00381-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate case number: 01-16-00381-CRAppellate case number: 01-16-00382-CR

11-01-2016

Ishamel Mitchell v. The State of Texas


ORDER Trial court case number: 1461724 1461725 Trial court: 232nd District Court of Harris County, Texas

Appellant's court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above-referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). And, counsel on appellant's behalf has filed a motion requesting an extension of the appellate timetable to allow appellant time to receive and review the appellate record and file a pro se response. Appellant has filed, and the Court has granted, appellant's pro se motion for access to the appellate record and an extension to file his pro se response to counsel's Anders brief. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot counsel's "Motion to Extend Appellate Timetable."

It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

[×] Acting individually Date: November 1, 2016


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
Nov 1, 2016
Appellate case number: 01-16-00381-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ishamel Mitchell v. The State of Texas

Court:COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Nov 1, 2016

Citations

Appellate case number: 01-16-00381-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 1, 2016)