From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 20, 2014
140 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 5D13–4297.

2014-06-20

Willie MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Kenneth R. Lester, Jr., Judge. Willie Mitchell, Miami, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


3.801 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Kenneth R. Lester, Jr., Judge.


Willie Mitchell, Miami, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's order denying the rule 3.801 motion filed by appellant, Willie Mitchell, based on the facial insufficiency of the motion. Such affirmance is without prejudice to Mitchell amending his motion to state a facially sufficient claim. SeeFla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e). PALMER, EVANDER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jun 20, 2014
140 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Mitchell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jun 20, 2014

Citations

140 So. 3d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)