From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Snowden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P.

October 21, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to conduct discovery. At the time plaintiff drafted his pending request he did not have the benefit of the court's October 6, 2011 order. In that order, the court extended the deadline for the parties to conduct discovery until January 6, 2012. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time is therefore unnecessary.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 65) is denied as unnecessary.

DATED: October 20, 2011.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Snowden

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2011
No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Snowden

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL JEROME MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. SNOWDEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1658 JAM DAD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2011)