From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Shope

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 6, 2024
3:23-cv-141-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-141-KAP

05-06-2024

JUWAN MITCHELL, Plaintiff v. C. O. SHOPE, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Keith A. Pesto, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff Mitchell's motion for appointment of counsel, ECF no. 10, is denied. Local Civil Rule 10.C provides that “[a]bsent special circumstances, no motions for the appointment of counsel will be granted until after dispositive motions have been resolved.” The local rule reflects the experience-based judgment of the District Court that, given the few attorneys who have expressed willingness to represent inmates pro bono, counsel should be reserved for cases pending trial. There are no special circumstances here: the plaintiff's status as an indigent prison inmate is the same as most applicants.

The plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF no. 16, on or before May 28, 2024.

Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Juwan Mitchell QJ-0036

S.C.I. Mahanoy

301 Grey Line Drive

Frackville, PA 17931


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Shope

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 6, 2024
3:23-cv-141-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Shope

Case Details

Full title:JUWAN MITCHELL, Plaintiff v. C. O. SHOPE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 6, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-141-KAP (W.D. Pa. May. 6, 2024)