From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Sanford

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 2, 1947
161 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 11802.

May 2, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; E. Marvin Underwood, Judge.

Proceeding by William Mitchell against Joseph W. Sanford, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia. From a judgment William Mitchell appeals.

Affirmed.

William Mitchell, in pro. per., of Atlanta, Ga., and Conrad J. Lynn, of New York City, for appellant.

J. Ellis Mundy, U.S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger and F. Douglas King, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before SIBLEY, McCORD, and LEE, Circuit Judges.


Mitchell was convicted in the Southern District of New York for the interstate transportation of a woman for immoral purposes. He was sentenced on March 17, 1942, to serve a term of four years and ten months in the penitentiary. On appeal the judgment of conviction was affirmed and certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court on March 27, 1944. United States v. Mitchell, 2 Cir., 137 F.2d 1006, certiorari denied 321 U.S. 794, 64 S.Ct. 785, 88 L.Ed. 1083.

Pending his appeal Mitchell did not elect to begin service of his sentence, but remained confined in the custody of the trial court. There is, therefore, no merit in his present contention that he began service of his sentence on March 17, 1942. Mosheik v. Bates, 66 App.D.C. 318, 87 F.2d 221; Baker v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 142 F.2d 615.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Sanford

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 2, 1947
161 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Sanford

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL v. SANFORD, Warden

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 2, 1947

Citations

161 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Sheridan v. State

We held that the trial court did not have authority to revoke the suspended sentence after the year had…

Joeckel v. Gust

R.S. 1919, sec. 6893. (4) The general rule that removal or sale of a tenant's property does not destroy the…