From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Pitkins

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-294 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-294.

April 30, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2010, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Doc. No. 7), to which no objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing;
3. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for statistical purposes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Pitkins

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-294 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Pitkins

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. DAVID PITKINS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 30, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-294 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 30, 2010)