From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 11, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cv-01205 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cv-01205 JLT (PC) Doc. 3

09-11-2011

JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. PENA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 22, 2011, the Court instructed Plaintiff to complete and return within thirty days the form regarding consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (Doc. 3-1.) The thirty-day period has now expired, and Plaintiff has not filed the consent form or otherwise responded to the Court's order.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed based upon his failure to comply with a Court order. In addition, if Plaintiff wishes to continue pursuing his claims in this case, he must complete and return the form regarding consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Otherwise, Plaintiff is advised that this action will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Pena

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 11, 2011
Case No. 1:11-cv-01205 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Pena

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. PENA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cv-01205 JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2011)