From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
4:24-cv-00342-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00342-KGB

12-02-2024

MICHAEL MITCHELL PLAINTIFF v. DEXTER PAYNE, Director Arkansas Division of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin (Dkt. No. 8). Although the Court granted petitioner Michael Mitchell an extension of time to object to Judge Ervin's Recommended Disposition, Mr. Mitchell did not object to the Recommended Disposition; the extended time for objecting has passed (Dkt. No. 10). After careful consideration of the Recommended Disposition, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 8). The Court dismisses with prejudice Mr. Mitchell's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1). The Court denies a certificate of appealability because Mr. Mitchell has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

It is so ordered this 2nd day of December, 2024.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Payne

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
4:24-cv-00342-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Payne

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MITCHELL PLAINTIFF v. DEXTER PAYNE, Director Arkansas Division of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 2, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00342-KGB (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)