From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Olsen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. C 11-3577 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-3577 SI

10-19-2011

BERNARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ROUTH CRABTREE OLSEN, et al. Defendants.


ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR

REVIEW PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL

RULE 3-12(c)

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the Court refers this case to the judge assigned to Mitchell v. OneWest Bank et al., 10-4207 JSW, for a determination of whether the cases are related. The Clerk shall send this order to all parties in both cases, and, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the parties must file any responses in opposition to or in support of relating the cases pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(d). The October 28, 2011 hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is VACATED. The motions will be rescheduled for hearing after the related case determination.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Olsen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. C 11-3577 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Olsen

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ROUTH CRABTREE OLSEN, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-3577 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)