From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. O'Hara

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 8, 1937
165 Misc. 630 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)

Opinion

December 8, 1937.

Appeal from the City Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx.

Blecheisen Whalen [ Jacob Blecheisen of counsel], for the appellant.

Morris Bauman, for the respondent.


It was error to submit the false arrest cause of action to the jury. It is conceded that the defendant was assaulted, and thereafter he reported the matter to the police authorities, who, acting on their own responsibility, arrested the plaintiff. Defendant may be liable for malicious prosecution, but he cannot be sued for false arrest. The case having been submitted to the jury on both causes of action, it is impossible to determine upon which the verdict is founded. There must be a reversal if either theory is unsupported by adequate evidence.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — LYDON, LEVY and HAMMER, JJ.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. O'Hara

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 8, 1937
165 Misc. 630 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
Case details for

Mitchell v. O'Hara

Case Details

Full title:HYMAN MITCHELL, Respondent, v. WILLIAM J. O'HARA, Appellant, and HENRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1937

Citations

165 Misc. 630 (N.Y. App. Term 1937)
1 N.Y.S. 20

Citing Cases

Stearns v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth

We must therefore look elsewhere for legal support or lack of it, so far as the case as against this…

Dizazzo v. Miss Carolina Sportswear

The testimony established conclusively that the arrests were made by a police officer acting upon his own…