From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. O'Gorman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

March, 1910.


Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hirschberg, P.J., Woodward, Jenks and Burr, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented upon the ground that plaintiff's counsel persisted in asking questions known to him to be improper, and thereby making suggestions that were prejudicial to the defendant.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. O'Gorman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1910
137 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Mitchell v. O'Gorman

Case Details

Full title:Grace W. Mitchell, Respondent, v. William J. O'Gorman, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1910

Citations

137 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)