From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-1150

04-25-2012

DARIUS DYWANE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN, Defendant - Appellee, and VALUE OPTIONS; RIVERSIDE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendants.

Darius Dywane Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM)

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darius Dywane Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darius Mitchell appeals the district court's order dismissing his claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman, No. 4:11-cv-00118-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 25, 2012
471 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Northrop Grumman

Case Details

Full title:DARIUS DYWANE MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 25, 2012

Citations

471 F. App'x 212 (4th Cir. 2012)