Opinion
Argued December 1, 1914
Decided December 15, 1914
Walter H. Dodd and Edward H. Tatum for appellants.
Norbert Heinsheimer and Henry K. Heyman for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the original contract had not been under seal the evidence offered would not be sufficient to show that the same had been modified by a subsequent parol contract.
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ. Absent: WERNER, J.