From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 5, 1981
275 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1981)

Opinion

21391

February 5, 1981.

McLeod, Fraser Unger, Walterboro, for appellant. Charles E. Houston, Jr., Walterboro, for respondent. Martin S. Driggers, Sr., Saleeby, Sox, Driggers Bledsoe, Hartsville, in behalf of South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae.


February 5, 1981.


This is an appeal from a denial of a motion for summary judgment in a tort action for personal injuries by an unemancipated minor against his parent. An order denying a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision which is not directly appealable. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. City of Spartanburg, 267 S.C. 210, 227 S.E.2d 188 (1976). This appeal is therefore dismissed.

LEWIS, C.J., and LITTLEJOHN, NESS, GREGORY and HARWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 5, 1981
275 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1981)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:Timmy MITCHELL, a minor under the age of fourteen (14) years, by his…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 5, 1981

Citations

275 S.E.2d 1 (S.C. 1981)
275 S.E.2d 1

Citing Cases

Wright v. Craft

"The denial of summary judgment does not finally determine anything about the merits of the case. . . .…

Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina

This Court has repeatedly held that the denial of summary judgment is not directly appealable. Willisv.…