Mitchell v. Lopez

Full title: TARZ MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. ABRAHAM LOPEZ, et al. Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Case No. 3:08-cv-00382-ECR-RAM (D. Nev. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-00382-ECR-RAM.

October 17, 2011

CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General, KELLY S. WERTH, Deputy Attorney General, Nevada Bar No. 6860, Bureau of Litigation, Carson City, Nevada, Attorneys for Defendant Abraham Lopez.

GALLIAN, WILCOX, WELKER, OLSON BECKSTROM, L.C., TRAVIS N. BARRICK, ESQ., Las Vegas, Nevada, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

EDWARD REED, District Judge

It is stipulated and agreed by and between Plaintiff, Tarz Mitchell, by and through his attorney of record, Travis N. Barrick, Esq., of Gallian, Wilcox, Welker, Olson Beckstrom, L.C., and Defendant Abraham Lopez, by and through his counsel, Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Kelly S. Werth, Deputy Attorney General, that Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Docket No. 6, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), as the parties have reached a settlement.

Each party shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs.

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Having considered the preceding STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE, as agreed to by the parties hereinabove, good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice.