From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2021
20-cv-04294-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-04294-BLF

08-10-2021

RUBEN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Beth Labson Freeman United States District Judge

GOOD CAUSE being shown, the Court hereby grants respondent's request for an enlargement of time to and including October 4, 2021, in which to file with the Court and serve on petitioner a motion to dismiss or an answer to the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. If petitioner wishes to respond, he shall file with the Court and serve on respondent a traverse within 30 days of his receipt of an answer, or an opposition within 28 days of his receipt of a motion to dismiss. Respondent shall file with the Court on serve on petitioner a reply within 14 days of his receipt of any opposition to a motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 10, 2021
20-cv-04294-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:RUBEN MITCHELL, Petitioner, v. RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

20-cv-04294-BLF (N.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2021)