From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Haviland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion


JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. J. HAVILAND, et al., Defendants. No. 2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 6, 2015

          ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On February 5, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. The findings and recommendations filed February 5, 2015, are adopted in full;

         2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff's retaliation claim against defendant Garcia is granted; and

         3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied on all remaining claims.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Haviland

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 6, 2015
2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. J. HAVILAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015)