From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. DMHA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. 3:11cv160 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11cv160

09-13-2011

ANTHONY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. DMHA, et al., Defendants.


JUDGE WALTER HERBERT RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #4) IN THEIR

ENTIRETY AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS THERETO

(DOC. #5); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS

AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF HEREIN; ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS DENIED; TERMINATION ENTRY

Pursuant to the reasoning and citations of authority set forth in the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #4), as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, said Report and Recommendations are adopted in their entirety. The Plaintiff's Objections to said judicial filing (Doc. #5) are overruled.

Judgment will be entered ordered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff herein, dismissing the Plaintiff's Complaint, without prejudice to a refiling, subject to the applicable Rules and legal authority.

Given that any appeal from this Court's opinion would be objectively frivolous and, therefore, not be taken in good faith, leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied.

The captioned cause is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

WALTER HERBERT RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Anthony Mitchell, Pro Se


Summaries of

Mitchell v. DMHA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. 3:11cv160 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. DMHA

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. DMHA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:11cv160 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 13, 2011)

Citing Cases

Grady v. U.S. Dep't of Def.

Although this observation comes from Justice Souter's dissenting opinion in Iqbal, courts have subsequently…

Gobin v. Holder

Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 696 (Souter, J., dissenting). Although that observation comes from the Iqbal dissent,…