From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Director, Beaufort County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Apr 25, 2007
C/A No. 6:07-382-JFA-WMC (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2007)

Opinion

C/A No. 6:07-382-JFA-WMC.

April 25, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court for review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The pro se petitioner, Danardis Mitchell, is a pre-trial detainee at the Greenwood County Detention Center in Greenwood, South Carolina. The petitioner brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 alleging false arrest, illegal detention, malicious prosecution and subordination of perjury. He maintains he is in custody in violation of the United States Constitution.

The Magistrate Judge's review is made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Civil Rule 73.02. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with the court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, or recommit the matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Objections must specifically identify the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made and the basis for such objections. In the absence of a timely filed objection, a district judge need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005).

In a detailed Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge suggests that the petition is subject to dismissal because the petitioner has not fully exhausted his state remedies. Because the Magistrate Judge fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and standards of law, such will not be repeated herein.

The petitioner was advised of his right to file timely and specific objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court has reviewed the petitioner's objections and finds them to be without merit.

After carefully examining the applicable law, the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and incorporates the Report herein by reference.

Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Director, Beaufort County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. South Carolina
Apr 25, 2007
C/A No. 6:07-382-JFA-WMC (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2007)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Director, Beaufort County Detention Center

Case Details

Full title:Danardis Mitchell, #47031, Petitioner, v. Director, Beaufort County…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Apr 25, 2007

Citations

C/A No. 6:07-382-JFA-WMC (D.S.C. Apr. 25, 2007)

Citing Cases

Plummer v. Adm'r

Before Plummer can pursue her federal habeas claim, she must fully exhaust her state court remedies. Mitchell…

Lucas v. Allen

To the extent that Lucas seeks release from her state criminal charges, her "exclusive federal remedy is to…