From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 14, 2021
1:21-cv-01434-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01434-SKO (PC)

12-14-2021

JOHN E. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

SHEILA K. OBERTO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff John E. Mitchell has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 9.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a “plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Once a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

Because Plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal, and no opposing party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Diaz

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 14, 2021
1:21-cv-01434-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:JOHN E. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01434-SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2021)