From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Denton Cnty.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 31, 2022
CIVIL 4:18-cv-399-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

CIVIL 4:18-cv-399-ALM-KPJ

03-31-2022

DUSTIN MITCHELL, #02221593 Plaintiff, v. DENTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action (the “Report”) (Dkt. #87), this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Pending before the Court is Defendants Denton County, Sheriff Tracy Murphree, Sergeant Inman, and Sergeant Cordell's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #62). In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommended the Motion be granted and Plaintiff's lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge further recommended that this dismissal be counted as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Motion (Dkt. #62) is GRANTED;

2. This lawsuit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

3. Plaintiff is advised that this dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Denton Cnty.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Mar 31, 2022
CIVIL 4:18-cv-399-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Denton Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN MITCHELL, #02221593 Plaintiff, v. DENTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

CIVIL 4:18-cv-399-ALM-KPJ (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2022)

Citing Cases

Ratley v. Beck

Luken, 71 F.3d at 193 (holding that “administrative segregation, without more, does not constitute a…

Gibson v. Skinner

, report and recommendation adopted, No. 4:18-cv-399-ALM-KPJ, 2022 WL 987819 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2022).…