From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 8, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered February 8, 2000, which, in an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident, granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Brian J. Isaac, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Arthur V. Lynch, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Williams, Saxe, Friedman, JJ.


There is no merit to plaintiffs' contention that defendant is estopped from asserting that New York courts lack jurisdiction over his person because he failed to notify the Department of Motor Vehicles of his new, out-of-State address pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 505(5)(see, Keane v. Kamin, 94 N.Y.2d 263). There is simply no jurisdictional predicate for this action. Defendant was not a domiciliary of New York, either at the time of the complained of New Jersey accident or at the time the action was commenced (id.).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Cunningham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 8, 2001
281 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Cunningham

Case Details

Full title:REGINA MITCHELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THOMAS CUNNINGHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 8, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 192 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 527

Citing Cases

Prawl v. Ajasin

Cruz v. Taino Constr. Corp. , 38 AD3d 391, 392 (1st Dep't 2007); Herrera v. A. Pegasus Limousine Corp. , 34…

Matiash v. Schwarze

Generally, under these circumstances, the defendant would be estopped from contesting the validity of service…