From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Coastline Capital Fund 7, LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 12, 2022
Civil Action H-22-393 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action H-22-393

05-12-2022

VAUGHN MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND 7, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Lee H. Rosenthal Chief United States District Judge

Vaughn Mitchell sued U.S. Bank in state court alleging that he never received proper notices before the posting of his property for a foreclosure sale. (Docket Entry No. 1-1 at 8). U.S. Bank moved to dismiss, and Coastline Capital Fund 7, LLC, the current holder of the relevant note and deed, was substituted as the defendant. (Docket Entry Nos. 6, 7, 8). Mitchell then filed a first amended complaint against Coastline Capital.

Coastline Capital has moved to dismiss Mitchell's first amended complaint. (Docket Entry No. 16). Mitchell has responded, informing the court that based on the information he has learned from the initial stages of litigation, he no longer has a factual basis for his claims and agrees that Coastline Capital's motion to dismiss should be granted. (Docket Entry No. 17). The court grants Coastline Capital's motion to dismiss. (Docket Entry No. 16). This action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Coastline Capital Fund 7, LLC

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 12, 2022
Civil Action H-22-393 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Coastline Capital Fund 7, LLC

Case Details

Full title:VAUGHN MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. COASTLINE CAPITAL FUND 7, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: May 12, 2022

Citations

Civil Action H-22-393 (S.D. Tex. May. 12, 2022)