From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P

03-20-2012

WESLEY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 6, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 6, 2012, are adopted in full;
2. Defendant D. Clark is dismissed from this action.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:WESLEY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2012)