From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Caswell

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 30, 1963
377 P.2d 911 (Or. 1963)

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1963

Affirmed January 30, 1963

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Clackamas County, WINSTON L. BRADSHAW, Judge.

Richard C. Helgeson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were King, Miller, Anderson, Nash Yerke, Fredric A. Yerke, Jr., and Jean P. Lowman, Portland.

Harry A. Harris, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Stanley J. Mitchell, Oregon City.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, SLOAN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.


In this case plaintiff alleged that defendant was indebted to plaintiff's assignors for logging equipment furnished to defendant by plaintiff's assignors. Defendant denied the indebtedness and claimed he was engaged with the alleged creditor in a joint venture. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court found for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

The evidence clearly supports the trial court's finding that a joint venture had not existed. There is nothing further for us to decide. This appeal is without merit. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Caswell

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 30, 1963
377 P.2d 911 (Or. 1963)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Caswell

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL v. CASWELL

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 30, 1963

Citations

377 P.2d 911 (Or. 1963)
377 P.2d 911