From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Castillo

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00763-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00763-WYD-BNB.

October 1, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before me on the following motions filed by the plaintiff (the "Motions"):

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel [Doc. #40, filed 4/25/07]; and

2. Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel [Doc. #49, filed 7/3/07].

The plaintiff seeks an order compelling prison counselors, W. Haygood and L. Madison, and case manager, K. Flock, to immediately return his legal personal property concerning this action.

Haygood, Madison, and Flock are not parties to this case. Therefore, the Court does not have jurisdiction over them. Moreover, the rules of civil procedure permit a party to file a motion to compel in order to enforce a discovery request. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. The plaintiff is not seeking to enforce a discovery request.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Castillo

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 1, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00763-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER MITCHELL a/k/a C. ELI-JAH HAKEEM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff, v. J…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 1, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00763-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Oct. 1, 2007)