From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Arrow Fin. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2011
NO: 2:11-cv-00443 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

NO: 2:11-cv-00443.

August 22, 2011

Amy L. Bennecoff, Esquire, KIMMEL SILVERMAN, P.C., Ambler, PA, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Joann Needleman, Esquire, MAURICE NEEDLEMAN, Philadelphia, PA, Attorney for Defendant.


Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), it is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for Plaintiff, Michael S. Mitchell, and Defendant, Arrow Financial Services, that this action and all of the claims set forth therein are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs and fees.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Arrow Fin. Servs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2011
NO: 2:11-cv-00443 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Arrow Fin. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL S. MITCHELL, Plaintiff v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

NO: 2:11-cv-00443 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2011)