Opinion
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01652-MSK-BNB.
December 2, 2009
ORDER
The parties appeared this morning for a scheduling conference. They presented competing scheduling orders rather than a unified order as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1. The competing scheduling orders were refused. Consistent with matters discussed at the conference this morning and for the reasons stated on the record:
IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall meet and prepare a single proposed scheduling order, which they shall submit to the court electronically on or before December 9, 2009.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed scheduling order shall include the following deadlines: 26 26
Deadline to complete Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures: December 31, 2009 Deadline to join parties and amend pleadings: January 4, 2010 Discovery Cut-Off: June 1, 2010 Dispositive Motions Deadline: July 1, 2010 Expert Disclosures: (a) The parties shall designate all experts and provide pro se parties and opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. (a)(2) on or before April 1, 2010 (b) The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide pro se parties and opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. (a)(2) on or before April 30, 2010 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a supplemental scheduling conference is set for December 22, 2009, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado.