From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitchell v. Adams

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Jul 23, 2021
Civil Action 5:21-cv-126 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:21-cv-126

07-23-2021

ALLISON KEIGHTLEY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN P. ADAMS, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES BE DENIED

JAMES P. MAZZONE JUDGE

On July 23, 2021, the pro se plaintiff, Allison Mitchell, filed this civil rights complaint together with a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and a Prisoner Trust Account Report (“PTAR”) with ledger sheets. The PTAR and ledger sheets reveal that the plaintiff has an available balance of $927.09. Consequently, the plaintiff has more than enough money to pay the $402.00 filing fee. Accordingly, the plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees should be denied, and she should be ordered to pay the full filing fee. The plaintiff should also be warned that the failure to pay the full filing fee within the time allowed by the Court will result in the dismissal of her complaint for failure to prosecute.

The plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the date of entry of this Report and Recommendation within which to file with the Clerk of this Court, specific written objections, identifying the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, and the basis of such objection. A copy of such objections should also be submitted to the United States District Judge. Objections shall not exceed ten (10) typewritten pages or twenty (20) handwritten pages, including exhibits, unless accompanied by a motion for leave to exceed the page limitations, consistent with LR PL P 12.

Failure to file written objections as set forth above shall constitute a waiver of de novo review by the District Court and a waiver of appellate review by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984).

The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Report and Recommendation to the pro se plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt requested, to her last known address as shown on the docket.


Summaries of

Mitchell v. Adams

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Jul 23, 2021
Civil Action 5:21-cv-126 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Mitchell v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ALLISON KEIGHTLEY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN P. ADAMS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 5:21-cv-126 (N.D.W. Va. Jul. 23, 2021)