Opinion
No. 2:06-cv-2321 GEB-GGH
08-18-2011
ROBERT MITCHELL, Plaintiff, v. D.G. ADAMS, et al., Defendants
KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC CARTER C. WHITE, CSB #164149 U.C. Davis School of Law Attorneys for Plaintiff, Robert Mitchell KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California DAVID A. CARRASCO, State Bar No. 160460 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Adams, Daviega, J. Diaz, J.A. Diaz, Epperson, Hellwig, Hill, Hubach, Morrison, Ortiz, Owen, Tellerico, and Vanderville
KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC
CARTER C. WHITE, CSB #164149
U.C. Davis School of Law
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Robert Mitchell
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
DAVID A. CARRASCO, State Bar No. 160460
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
DIANA ESQUIVEL, State Bar No. 202954
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants Adams, Daviega, J. Diaz,
J.A. Diaz, Epperson, Hellwig, Hill, Hubach,
Morrison, Ortiz, Owen, Tellerico, and Vanderville
AMENDED CONDITIONAL ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT
All parties in the above-captioned case have filed a "Consent to Jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge." See 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c). According to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the assignment of the action to the magistrate judge. I approve the assignment, and if the magistrate judge approves the assignment all documents thereafter filed shall bear case number and initials 2:06-cv-2321 GGH, and the then scheduled dates before me are VACATED.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge