From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mistic v. Mistic

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 3, 2021
2021 N.D. 96 (N.D. 2021)

Opinion

20200313

06-03-2021

Kyra Joyce Mistic n/k/a Kyra J. Bellew, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Joshua James Mistic, Defendant and Appellee

William D. Woodworth, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.


Appeal from the District Court of Richland County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Bradley A. Cruff, Judge.

William D. Woodworth, Bismarck, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.

Amy M. Clark, Wahpeton, N.D., for defendant and appellee; submitted on brief.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1] Kyra Mistic appeals from an amended divorce judgment. She argues the district court's decision to award Joshua Mistic primary residential responsibility of the parties' three minor children is not supported by the evidence. She also argues the court did not provide her with adequate time to present her case at an evidentiary hearing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). See Wolt v. Wolt, 2010 ND 26, ¶ 7, 778 N.W.2d 786 (we will not reweigh evidence under the clearly erroneous standard of review, which applies to primary residential responsibility determinations). See also Mairs v. Mairs, 2014 ND 132, ¶ 12, 847 N.W.2d 785 (a district court's imposition of time limitations at an evidentiary hearing is reviewed for an abuse of discretion). Joshua Mistic's motion to strike is denied.

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W.VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Mistic v. Mistic

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Jun 3, 2021
2021 N.D. 96 (N.D. 2021)
Case details for

Mistic v. Mistic

Case Details

Full title:Kyra Joyce Mistic n/k/a Kyra J. Bellew, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Joshua…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Jun 3, 2021

Citations

2021 N.D. 96 (N.D. 2021)
960 N.W.2d 764