" Appellee having been injured by the operation of a train, the burden was then on appellant to show that it was not negligent. This it wholly failed to do, except to show no southbound train passed through Gifford on October 10th, at about 4:30 P.M. See Missouri Pac. R. R. Co. v. McDade, 186 Ark. 317, 53 S.W.2d 595. Other assignments argued relate to instructions given and refused.
This testimony may not, however, be treated as undisputed, although much corroboration is afforded it by the records of the bank, for the reason that the testimony comes from interested parties. Skillern v. Baker, 82 Ark. 86, 100 S.W. 764; Missouri Pacific Rd. Co. v. Trotter, 184 Ark. 790, 43 S.W.2d 762; Missouri Pacific Rd. Co. v. McDade, 186 Ark. 317, 53 S.W.2d 595. However, there is some undisputed testimony which it would be arbitrary to disregard.