From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Missos v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2006
30 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8892N.

June 22, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2005, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action for want of prosecution, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Lewis Lewis, P.C., Buffalo (Emily L. Downing of counsel), for appellant.

Herzfeld Rubin, P.C., New York (Neil R. Finkston of counsel), for General Motors Corporation, respondent.

Conway, Farrell, Curtin Kelly, P.C., New York (Jonathan T. Uejio of counsel), for Kite Painting Company, Inc., respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ., concur.


Defendant served a 90-day notice on December 20, 2003 and moved to dismiss 10 months later on October 21, 2004. Plaintiff's attorney states that he attempted to file a note of issue in February 2004 but was told by the Clerk that he needed a stipulation or court order restoring the case to a calendar from which it had been stricken, apparently by mistake, in September 1998 (it is not clear what rule of court the Clerk was enforcing). It appears that plaintiff's attorney had been attempting to obtain precisely such a stipulation since April 1999, but his many requests therefor were ignored by third-party defendant's attorney, and that in November 2002 the latter finally advised the former in no uncertain terms that he was not going to sign such a stipulation. No reason is given why, if plaintiff needed a stipulation or court order of some kind, and third-party defendant was refusing the stipulation, a court order was not sought. The action, which seeks damages for personal injuries sustained in a 1989 accident, bears a 1992 index number and a 1997 third-party action index number, and has had no meaningful activity since 1999, should be dismissed for neglect to prosecute (CPLR 3216; see Baczkowski v. Collins Constr. Co., 89 NY2d 499, 504-505). We note that plaintiff's opposition papers do not contain an affidavit of merit (CPLR 3216 [e]).


Summaries of

Missos v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 2006
30 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Missos v. General Motors Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY MISSOS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Respondent and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 5114
817 N.Y.S.2d 60

Citing Cases

Small v. Metro. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

As plaintiff has yet to demonstrate a meritorious cause of action or reasonable excuse for her multi-year…

County v. Cannady

Plaintiffs lateness in filing the notice of trial in Civil Court pursuant to the CPLR 3216 90-day written…