From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Ellzey

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Apr 3, 1961
128 So. 2d 561 (Miss. 1961)

Opinion

No. 41757.

April 3, 1961.

1. Eminent domain — award excessive — remittitur order.

$36,400 for taking of 22.43 acres of pasture land on which there were a few improvements was excessive by $11,400.

Headnote as approved by Ethridge, J.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Jones County; LUNSFORD CASEY, Judge.

Welch, Gibbes Graves, Boyd Holifield, Laurel, for appellant.

I. The court below erred in refusing to grant appellant's motion for a new trial for the reason that the Court erred in refusing to exclude the testimony of the witnesses M.P. Carter and O.E. Hart, Sr. Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Taylor, 237 Miss. 847, 116 So.2d 757; Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Taylor, 240 Miss. 1, 124 So.2d 684; 5 Nichols on Eminent Domain, Sec. 18.4(1) p. 135.

II. Appellees' proof of damages is without probative value and there is no credible evidence to support the jury's verdict. The verdict is so excessive as to evince bias, passion and prejudice on the part of the jury. The verdict is shocking to the enlightened conscience. Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Ellzey, 237 Miss. 345, 114 So.2d 769; Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Rogers, 236 Miss. 800, 112 So.2d 250; Jahr on Eminent Domain, Sec. 150.

Deavours Hilbun, George Maxey, Laurel, for appellees.

I. Cited and discussed the following authorities: Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Brooks, 239 Miss. 308, 123 So.2d 423; Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Pittman (Miss.), 120 So.2d 434; Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Treas, 197 Miss. 670, 20 So.2d 475.


The Mississippi State Highway Commission appeals from a judgment of the Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Jones County, in favor of R.B. Ellzey, et al. In this eminent domain proceeding, appellees were awarded by the jury the sum of $36,400 for the taking of 22.43 acres of land for a right of way, and for damages to the remainder of appellees' tract. This is the second appearance of this cause. In the former case, reported in 237 Miss. 345, 114 So.2d 769, the jury awarded damages of $39,500, which this Court held were so grossly excessive as to shock the conscience. The cause was reversed and remanded. The facts are fully set out in the former decision.

(Hn 1) After a careful examination of this record, we are of the opinion that the verdict of $36,400 is also grossly excessive. No reasonable man, in an impartial and objective search for truth, could find damages in that amount under the facts of this case. Miss. State Highway Comm. v. Taylor, 237 Miss. 847, 116 So.2d 757 (1959). The prior adjudications in this case apply here. Hence the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and remanded for a new trial, unless within ten days from this date a remittitur in the amount of $11,400 is entered herein, thus reducing the award of total damages to $25,000, together with interest from the date of the judgment of this Court.

Reversed and remanded, unless appellees accept remittitur.

McGehee, C.J., Kyle, Arrington and Rodgers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Ellzey

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Apr 3, 1961
128 So. 2d 561 (Miss. 1961)
Case details for

Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Ellzey

Case Details

Full title:MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. ELLZEY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Apr 3, 1961

Citations

128 So. 2d 561 (Miss. 1961)
128 So. 2d 561

Citing Cases

Mississippi State Highway Comm. v. Peterson

In a condemnation proceeding the Supreme Court will give great weight to the verdict of the jury when it is…

State Highway Com'n of Miss. v. Havard

1986); Trustees of Wade Baptist Church v. Mississippi State Highway Commission, 469 So.2d 1241, 1245 (Miss.…