¶2. This Court has previously documented the history of disputes over this property, first in Mississippi Sand Solutions, LLC v. Otis , 248 So. 3d 813, 815–19 (2018) ( Otis I ), and then again in Mississippi Sand Solutions, LLC v. Otis , 289 So. 3d 708, 709–12 (2019) ( Otis II ). The facts detailed in Otis I and Otis II are pertinent here.

MSS appealed that decision, and this Court unanimously affirmed the chancery court's ruling that MSS did not have an easement over the Fisher heirs' property. Miss. Sand Sols. v. Otis , 248 So. 3d 813 (Miss. 2018). Additionally, settlement negotiations between the parties broke down, and the Fisher heirs demanded that MSS cease and desist traversing their property.

Therefore, the claim fails if the claimant fails to prove even one of the six elements. See, e.g. , Miss. Sand Solutions LLC v. Otis , 248 So. 3d 813, 818-20 (¶¶19-29) (Miss. 2018) ; Paw Paw Island Land Co. v. Issaquena & Warren Counties Land Co. , 51 So. 3d 916, 923-26 (¶¶27-41) (Miss. 2010) ; Biddix v. McConnell , 911 So. 2d 468, 475 (¶18) (Miss.