From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miskell v. Chase

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2016
646 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-1108

04-22-2016

JUDY KAY MISKELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARRY L. CHASE; WILLIAM L. HAUGH, JR., Defendants - Appellees.

Judy Kay Miskell, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-00019-CCB) Before AGEE, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Judy Kay Miskell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Judy Kay Miskell appeals the district court's order returning correspondence that Miskell attempted to file in her closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miskell v. Chase, No. 1:15-cv-00019-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Miskell v. Chase

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2016
646 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Miskell v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:JUDY KAY MISKELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HARRY L. CHASE; WILLIAM L…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2016

Citations

646 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2016)