From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2012
36 A.3d 241 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-25

STATE of Connecticut v. Richard S. TAYLOR.

Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Harry Welter, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Daniel J. Krisch, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Harry Welter, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn.App. 357, 31 A.3d 872 (2011), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that in a conspiracy case it is sufficient for the court to instruct the jury that, with respect to the first essential element that there was an agreement, ‘[i]t is sufficient to show that the parties knowingly engaged in a mutual plan to do a criminal act?’ ”


Summaries of

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 25, 2012
36 A.3d 241 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Richard S. TAYLOR.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

36 A.3d 241 (Conn. 2012)
303 Conn. 930

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

Id. We then granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal to this court, limited to the…

State v. Taylor

Id. We then granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal to this court, limited to the…