From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mishkin v. Dormer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1976
53 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

June 8, 1976


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 27, 1976, granting plaintiff-appellant's motion (to strike defendant Dormer's answer and for entry of judgment) only to the extent of directing Dormer to appear for examination before trial no later than 20 days after the disposition of a then-pending motion addressed to the complaint or after service of any amended complaint therein mandated, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The complaint having been held in the then-pending motion to require amendment, Dormer, despite his stipulation, should not be required to be deposed until his examination can be circumscribed by a proper pleading and because, otherwise, he might be required to be deposed under both complaints.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Lupiano, Silverman, Lane and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Mishkin v. Dormer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 8, 1976
53 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Mishkin v. Dormer

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL MISHKIN, Appellant, v. ROBERT DORMER, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 8, 1976

Citations

53 A.D.2d 531 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)