From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Jun 18, 2001
533 U.S. 914 (2001)

Opinion

JUNE 18, 2001


No. D-2241. IN RE DISBARMENT OF GOMSRUD. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1138/]

No. D-2242. IN RE DISBARMENT OF FREEMAN. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1139.]

No. D-2243. IN RE DISBARMENT OF MCKEE. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1139.]

No. D-2244. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SEAGULL. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1139.]

No. D-2248. IN RE DISBARMENT OF MORRISSEY. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1139.]

No. D-2249. IN RE DISBARMENT OF RATHJEN. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1140.]

No. D-2251. IN RE DISBARMENT OF BARRETT. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1188.]

No. D-2252. IN RE DISBARMENT OF MCGEE. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1188.]

No. D-2253. IN RE DISBARMENT OF SIEGFRIED. Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 531 U.S. 1188.]

No. 00-1406. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC v. ECHAZABAL. C.A. 9th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.

No. 00-10111. IN RE BOLANO;

No. 00-10204. IN RE FLOWERS; and

No. 00-10222. IN RE THOMAS. Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.

No. 00-10228. IN RE WESTINE. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.

No. 00-10456 (00A1072). IN RE GARZA. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to JUSTICE SCALIA, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.

No. 00-9459. IN RE PETWAY; and

No. 00-9945. IN RE VONIA. Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.


Summaries of

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Jun 18, 2001
533 U.S. 914 (2001)
Case details for

Miscellaneous Orders

Case Details

Full title:MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 18, 2001

Citations

533 U.S. 914 (2001)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Waiters

The Court must also evaluate "whether the right was clearly established." Id. (citing Saucier v. Katz, 533…

Eichelman v. Lancaster County

The Supreme Court has cautioned that the inquiry as to whether a right was "clearly established" "must be…